Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A70, getting a 77.1 score against 76.9. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has newer 13 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's design is noticeably newer and much lighter than the Galaxy A70's, although it's also notably thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy A70. Both of them have a display with the same size, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and the same pixel density. The Galaxy A70 has a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a much bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A70, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.