Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has an overall score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has newer 13 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2710px and a little bit better screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A70 counts with an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A70, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.