Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is newer than Galaxy A70's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy A70 both feature similar screens, both of them have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same pixel density and a same size display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A70 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 64 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper than the Galaxy A70, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.