Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, with a 79 score against 76.9. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is newer than the Galaxy A70, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy A70, they have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater pixels amount per screen inch and a display with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much bigger sensor.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.