Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a global score of 83, which is slightly better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T construction is newer than Galaxy A70's, although it's somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should offer very similar OS features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.