Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is slightly better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, getting a global score of 92.9 against 85.3. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW comes with Android 10 OS, while Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is newer and somewhat lighter than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's, although it's also just a little thicker.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a little better screen pixels density. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little bit longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.