Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than the iPhone XR's 82 global score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a little bit lighter phone than iPhone XR, but both are 0.33inches thick. The iPhone XR has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone XR has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a way lower 828 x 1792px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better storage for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 53% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.