Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the iPhone XS, having a 92.9 score against 84.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is newer than the iPhone XS's, although it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The iPhone XS features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone XS has a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 69% greater battery size. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a greater camera than iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.