Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Google Pixel, having a score of 92.9 against 80.2. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is notably newer and a little thinner than Google Pixel's, but it's much heavier. The Google Pixel features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than Google Pixel, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.