Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is newer than Google Pixel 3's, although it's extremely heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount per inch in the display. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2915mAh. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.