Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's general score of 80.7. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it is a bit heavier and a little thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3430mAh. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.