Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a general score of 92.9 against 78.9. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much higher 64 MP resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.