Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 92.9 against 81.9. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, we must tell that it's also a a little thicker and heavier cellphone. Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.