Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW body is way newer than the HTC U Ultra's, but it's just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra features a slightly better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way larger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.