Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the LG G7 Fit, having a general score of 92.9 against 77. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but it is heavier and just a little thicker. These devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG G7 Fit features a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.