Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is slightly better than the LG K92, having a score of 92.9 against 85.4. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction has the same thickness than the LG K92, but it is a bit lighter. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better performance than LG K92, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better display than LG K92. They have a screen of the same size, the same screen pixel density and the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size aperture, a same resolution back camera, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
LG K92 counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than LG K92, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.