Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is much better than the LG Q70's general score of 77.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is a little bit thicker but a bit lighter than the LG Q70, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 10 operating system.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior camera than LG Q70, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit more memory capacity for applications and games than LG Q70, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.