Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is better than LG V10's global score of 78.6. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has newer 10 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is way newer, just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than LG V10.
LG V10 features a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than LG V10, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better camera than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.