Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is better than the LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is notably newer, but heavier and thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a CPU that is just as good as the Galaxy A71 5G UW one, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features greater battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.