Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a 92.9 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better memory for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.