Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ, although they were released only a few months apart.
LG V60 ThinQ features a display that's just as good as Galaxy A71 5G UW's screen, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a bit larger screen, a just a little more pixels per display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates, a 0.59 inches camera sensor, a same resolution camera and a same size aperture.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.