Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Defy (2021), having a 92.9 score against 77.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is a lot thinner and lighter than the Motorola Defy (2021), although it was released about 11 months before.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a brighter screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a little larger display, a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Defy (2021) features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.