Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2022)'s 84.7 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is a lot older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Edge (2022).
Motorola Edge (2022)'s processor is just as good as the Galaxy A71 5G UW one, and although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge (2022) has a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's screen, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge (2022) has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2022), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.