Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a incredibly older, just a bit thicker and heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Motorola Edge 30 Neo have very similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 64 MP back camera, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.