Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40, having a score of 92.9 against 77.2. Despite being the best device in this review, it must be told that it's also way older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video and a tinier back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.