Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is a lot older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.