Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Motorola Moto G 5G were released only 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better screen than Moto G 5G. Both have a better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a same size screen and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Moto G 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.