Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, getting a 92.9 score against 86.2. Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older phone than Moto G200 5G, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Moto G200 5G has Android 11.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW feature similar displays, although the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a little higher pixel density and a little larger display. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. Moto G200 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way lower 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.