Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Moto G6 Plus, getting a general score of 92.9 against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a much newer cellphone than Moto G6 Plus, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Moto G6 Plus both have really similar screens, because although the Moto G6 Plus has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 41% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.