Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | -- |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Moto G60s, getting a general score of 92.9 against 79.9. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Moto G60s. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better display than Moto G60s, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit inferior pixels number per inch in the display and a bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better camera than Moto G60s, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega pixels, the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates. The Moto G60s has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60s has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.