Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 global score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner device than Motorola Moto G9 Play, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a quite larger screen, a better pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G9 Play, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.