Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 overall score. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than the Moto G9 Plus, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a little bit better screen pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G9 Plus counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G9 Plus. They have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate, a same resolution camera, the same sensor size and the same (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.