Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a global score of 92.9 against 76.4. Although the Galaxy A71 5G UW is notably newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better storage for apps and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has longer battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.