Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 92.9 score against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's heavier and extremely thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way larger sensor, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with slightly more memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.