Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is incredibly newer, but incredibly thicker and way heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit more memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures greater photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.