Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3, with a global score of 92.9 against 77.6. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is newer than Motorola Moto Z3's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Moto Z3 count with really similar screens, because although the Moto Z3 has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a bigger aperture and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.