Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having a global score of 92.9 against 76.3. Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a lot larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.