Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G, having a 92.9 score against 84.6. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Motorola One 5G were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
Motorola One 5G and Galaxy A71 5G UW count with incredibly similar displays, and although the Motorola One 5G has a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of screen, they both have a same size screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola One 5G counts with as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW one, both have exactly the same internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.