Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Motorola One Action, with a 92.9 score against 78.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's a little thinner and also newer. The Motorola One Action has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a bit higher pixels density.
Motorola One Action features as much storage capacity for apps and games as Galaxy A71 5G UW, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.