Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger display. Motorola One Hyper has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy A71 5G UW one, both of them have a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and exactly the same internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.