Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola One Vision, getting a 92.9 score against 80.7. Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is newer and a little thinner, but a little heavier than Motorola One Vision. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features improved battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.