Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 general score. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Motorola razr (2020) were released only 3 months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is a little thicker but also a bit lighter than the Motorola razr (2020). These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little larger screen, a just a little higher pixel count per inch of screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a processor that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW one, both of them have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera with much more MP and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.