Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s score of 81.1. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is just a bit lighter than the Motorola razr (2022), but it is a bit thicker and was released 2 years before.
Motorola razr (2022) has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have a display with the same size, the same quantity of pixels in each inch of display and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has improved battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.