Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a display that is just as good as Galaxy A71 5G UW's display, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per screen inch and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with better 30 fps video frame rates, a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has more storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a bit more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.