Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than OPPO Find X2's general score of 79.7. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X2. The OPPO Find X2 has a brighter display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a better pixels density.
The OPPO Find X2 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.