Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a global score of 92.9 against 77.7. These phones include the same Android 10 operating system, so they should offer very similar operating system features. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, we must note that it's also a a little heavier and a little thicker phone.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a little higher pixels count per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a greater storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.