Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a 92.9 score against 83.1. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is a little thinner and a little lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were released only 2 months apart. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should give you very similar operating system features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a better pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.