Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a global score of 92.9 against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a much better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the Galaxy A71 5G UW one.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.