Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | -- |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 general score. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is a little heavier and a bit thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back camera. Galaxy A71 5G UW has more memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.