Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's score of 84.6. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older cellphone than Galaxy A22 5G, but Samsung was able to build it a little lighter and just a little thinner.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A22 5G and Galaxy A71 5G UW both have similar displays, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.